Talk:Claymore Wiki

Categorization
Hi everyone, I'm new to this wiki but I've got grand plans, as all newbies do. What I am proposing is a general categorization of the articles for the sake of better navigation, etc. Right now, we only have a basic category tree for the characters but it is rather primitive and unrefined IMO. There is, however, a basic structure in the original Wikia installation, so we could go on with that.

To get to the point, here is the structure I propose. This is a pretty universal model IMO, which I've used with minor alterations on the Nanoha wiki and it worked great:


 * Category:Browse : The root category; also, the start page goes here
 * Category:Content : The actual payload of this wiki goes here or its subcategories
 * Category:Characters : Individual character articles go here (or the subcategories, but these are redundant if we use semantics)
 * Category:Abyssal One
 * Category:Awakened Being
 * Category:Claymore
 * Category:Male Claymore
 * Category:Human
 * Category:Factions : Individual factions, e.g. The Organization
 * Category:History : General historical articles, e.g. Northern Campaign
 * Category:Locations : Individual location articles, e.g. Rabona
 * Category:Media : Out-of-universe articles on the various media in the Claymore franchise
 * Category:Manga chapters : For manga chapter summaries
 * Category:Anime episodes : For anime episode summaries (rename Category:Anime Episode)
 * Category:Music : For various music articles
 * Category:Objects : Individual inanimate object articles, e.g. Black Card
 * Category:Species : Individual species articles, e.g. Abyssal one, Claymore, etc.
 * Category:Yoki : A catch-all category for everything related to yoki and other forms of "magic" in the Claymore-verse
 * Category:Images : All images go here by default
 * Category:Claymore symbols : We seem to have a lot of these, so they get an extra category
 * Category:Organisation
 * ...the standard stuff

What do you think? Ideas, suggestions, opinions? --Koveras Alvane 21:04, December 4, 2009 (UTC)


 * Well, since there are no objections, I'll go ahead an apply the categorization later today. --Koveras Alvane 09:01, December 7, 2009 (UTC)